1. Newsroom
  2. Spotlight: Tariffs, a regime change in progress
Analysen 13.03.2018

Spotlight: Tariffs, a regime change in progress

Spotlight: Tariffs, a regime change in progress

Though markets breathed a sigh of relief following the announcement of US tariffs, investors should regard them as a transition to the next stage of the Trump presidency using the UBP ‘Start-Stop’ Framework. Continued US dollar weakness and a more sustained rise in volatility should characterise the next phase of the Trump administration. Capital protected and hedge fund strategies should help cushion portfolios looking ahead.

‹Key points

  • The relief felt by markets following the US tariff announcement may be short-lived
  • ‹‹Recent moves on tariffs signal the start of the next, more challenging phase of the Trump presidency ‹‹
  • Risks of further sustained US dollar weakness and persistently elevated volatility
  • ‹‹Investors should look to increase exposure to capital protected and hedge fund strategies

Markets breathed a sigh of relief following the announcement of US tariffs on steel and aluminum which included exemptions for Canada and Mexico, two of the largest steel exporters to the US and with whom the US is currently renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

In the near term, this brings reassurance that an immediate trade confrontation is not set to flare up. Such a development might have signalled an unwelcome end to the trilateral trade bloc created in 1994. However, the series of tariffs implemented since the start of the year – covering lumber, airplanes, washing machines, solar panels and now steel and aluminum – confirms a pivot from the ‘Start’ stage of the UBP ‘Start-Stop’ framework (for more details see Spotlight: Navigating a Trump Presidency, February 2017) to the more challenging ‘Stop’ phase.

The ‘Start’ phase stimulated economic growth, driven by regulatory reform and culminated in the announcement of tax cuts in December 2017. The transition to a ‘Stop’ phase has been visible since January 2018 with accelerating inflationary pressures, a more aggressive tone to Fed interest rate policy combined with rising fiscal deficits in the United States.


As we enter campaign season ahead of the November 2018 Congressional elections, we expect the economic focus of the ‘Start’ phase should more meaningfully give way to the politically focused components of the ‘Stop’ phase. The more confrontational trade policy seen in recent weeks is likely to be only the beginning. With Canada and Mexico now exempt, the burden of US steel and aluminum tariffs falls mainly on Europe, Korea, Japan, Russia, Brazil and China. The EU and China have already indicated that they intend to retaliate with their own tariffs.

In the near term, given the strength not only of the US economy – with the US ISM survey signalling corporate confidence at 13-year highs and consumer confidence near 14-year highs – as well as the strength of other major economies around the world, it would take a broaderbased shift in global trade policy to stall growth momentum significantly. However, with retaliation potentially on the way from the EU and China, should the US continue to take a hard line in North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) negotiations, a victory by the populist presidential candidate in Mexico’s July elections could trigger a formal withdrawal by the US or Mexico from the free trade agreement. A course of action like this would remove the key obstacles to a much more direct trade confrontation within North America.

In addition, though Chinese steel and aluminum exports are a modest US$700m, the completion of a US investigation into Chinese compliance with intellectual property rights agreements looks set to complete over the summer. This also raises the potential for a more significant trade stand-off between the world’s two largest economies.

For investors, the most immediate risk as markets seek to price a less open global trading regime will be via the US dollar. It is worth looking back for a precedent to the 1980s and 1990s when the US and Japan, then the two largest economies in the world, regularly sparred over trade. Even following the 1985 Plaza Accord which devalued the US dollar against major trading partners, the then US President Ronald Reagan’s trade policies against Japan were followed by subsequent actions by President Bill Clinton culminating in 100% duties on imports of Japanese autos in 1995.

With a German coalition having been formed and a hung parliament in the Italian elections, the near-term threats to a sharp weakening in EURUSD appear to have passed. Though a delay to the expected tapering by the European Central Bank as well as historically large speculative positioning against the US dollar remain potential headwinds, the trajectory on trade suggests that medium-term US dollar weakness lies ahead.

The pivot to the ‘Stop’ phase of the UBP Trump framework also confirms the regime change in volatility highlighted in the UBP 2018 Investment Outlook. The beneficial low-falling volatility regime that characterised the strong market returns in 2017 has given way to a low, but rising regime in early 2018.


Historically, this has meant that while investors should be more wary of losses in volatile markets, the one year return profiles have remained attractive at near 10% in the S&P 500 (illustration). However, should the pivot to the ‘Stop’ phase entail a more significant trade confrontation, a shift from low and rising volatility may give way to a more harmful high and rising volatility regime where risk-reward tilts meaningfully against investors.

As a result, while the recent announcement on tariffs from the US has calmed markets, investors should use this as an opportunity to pivot portfolios to protect against the regime change - from ‘Start’ to ‘Stop’ - in the Trump presidency. At the same time, it would be wise to acknowledge the risks of a potential further regime change in volatility.

While bond investors have focused much of their risk management on reducing interest rate risk in fixed income portfolios, given the tightness of credit spreads, we believe it is time for investors to pivot their risk management efforts towards credit portfolios as well. In recent months, we have diversified our ‘high yielding’ bond exposure to include insurance-linked, asset backed securities and emerging market local currency debt exposure to reduce our reliance on US and European credit spreads to drive returns within portfolios. Increasingly, looking forward, we will look to non-US dollar, non-directional bond and hedge fund strategies to further diversify return drivers within fixed income portfolios.

Though the strong economic and earnings backdrop continues to favour equities over bonds, the shift in volatility regime means that opportunities are emerging in structured products to provide elements of capital protection into portfolios while still allowing for upside participation that we expect in equities. Moreover, volatility dampening strategies in the hedge fund arena offer investors growing opportunities to secure less directional exposure in equities, much like we have done in fixed income throughout 2017.

read the full document with charts

LOK Michael.jpg

Michaël Lok
Group CIO and Co-CEO Asset Management


Norman Villamin
CIO Private Banking


Patrice Gautry
Chief Economist


Diskretionäres Portfolio-management: Sie haben die Zügel in der Hand

Ihre Ziele und Wünsche sind einzigartig – genauso wie unser Ansatz im diskretionären Portfoliomanagement

Swiss & Global Equities

Why Swiss equities now? This market offers equity investors the stability and agility they need to navigate this volatile period. 

Read more

European Equities

European equities offer unrivalled opportunities in terms of breadth of sector and market exposure.

Read more

Meistgelesene News

Analysen 10.02.2021

COVID-19: Die UBP hält Sie auf dem Laufenden

Seit dem Ausbruch des Coronavirus begleiten und unterstützen wir unsere Kunden während dieser ungewöhnlichen Zeit einer weltweiten Gesundheitskrise. Die Bank informiert Sie regelmässig über die Anpassungen ihrer Massnahmen an die von den Gesundheitsbehörden vorgegebenen Vorsichtsregeln. Ausserdem kommen unsere Experten zu Wort, welche auf die Auswirkungen der Pandemie auf die Weltwirtschaft und die Finanzmärkte eingehen.

Analysen 24.11.2020

Perlen im SMID-Cap-Segment in Europa und der Schweiz

Unternehmen kleiner und mittlerer Kapitalisierung verzeichnen oftmals höhere Wachstumsraten und Renditen als Grosskonzerne. Es ist einfacher, ein kräftiges Wachstum von einer kleineren Basis aus zu generieren. Die sogenannten SMID Caps bieten Anlegern eine Positionierung in langfristigen Wachstumstrends.

Analysen 17.12.2020

UBP Investment Outlook 2021

Schöne neue Welt

Auch lesenswert

Analysen 25.02.2021

UBP’s small- and mid-cap capabilities

SMID-cap equities are poised to mean revert and outperform over the next three to five years. The best time to allocate to SMID caps is when earnings are “depressed”, i.e. now.

Analysen 24.02.2021

The return of leisure & entertainment

The pandemic has not only caused economic chaos around the world, but it has also had a deep impact on people’s lifestyles.

Analysen 19.02.2021

Global Recovery: Vaccine- & Stimulus-led

A clear light at the end of the coronavirus tunnel is now visible with the start of vaccination campaigns.