1. Newsroom
  2. Does private education generate positive impact?
Menu
UBP dans la presse 21.08.2020

Does private education generate positive impact?

Does private education generate positive impact?

Environmental Finance (14.08) - There is a strong argument for saying that private education has no place in impact investing because education is a basic public good that should be freely accessible to all. 


As always, however, the reality is a lot more complicated: there is actually a strong case for impact investing to support private education in certain circumstances, particularly in developing countries.

Perhaps the best way to look at the issues involved is to take Brazil as an example. In Brazil, public spending on education as a proportion of GDP is similar to that of OECD countries. However, out of this education budget, only 21% is spent on basic education. The largest share (43%) goes to fund tertiary education. In an already unequal country, this fuels further inequality since only 20% of public university students come from the lowest 40% income segment, while 65% come from the highest 40% income segment.

In contrast, 60% of basic education spending goes to support the lowest 40% income segment. This would suggest that the most efficient way to support lower income segments in education is to shift public spending towards basic education.

To compound the inequality, Brazil (together with Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Turkey) is one of the countries where higher education adds the most value. Not only does it significantly enhance the employment prospects of the Brazilians who have it – leading to a difference in the unemployment rate of up to 5 percentage points – but it also adds a salary premium of 115% on average, compared with 57% in the US and 50% in the OECD.

This system means that, on average, low-income students get a low-quality basic education, which makes them unable to get a place in the competitive public universities, which then significantly reduces their chances of getting decent employment opportunities and providing a good education for their own children.

This vicious circle of poverty, lack of higher education and unemployment could be alleviated by private tertiary education: this would free up state resources to increase the quality of basic education, helping to level the playing field.

To take another example, in Peru, more than 70% of the country’s 1.5 million higher-education students attend private institutions compared with one third in 1985. Part of the reason is the limited enrolment capacity of the public education system. The main public university in Peru accepts only 8% of applicants every year. After high school, many students attend academias, expensive preparatory schools to help them pass the competitive public university entrance exam. For students who do not have the resources to prepare for those exams or who do not get into public universities, the private sector provides an important alternative.

Even if one takes the view that private education has a role to play, this does not mean that every private education company generates positive impact. There are various stockmarket-listed education companies specialising in a wide range of activities including basic education, universities, vocational schools, after-school tutoring, exam preparation, distance learning and content creation.

Some of these activities are unsuitable for an impact strategy. For example, after-school tutoring and exam preparation not only increase income-based barriers to quality education, but also put undue competitive pressure on young children.

Affordability is another important impact filter. Distance-learning platforms and the content they host are technology-enabled affordability drivers. There are also many private education companies that offer cost-effective solutions to a wide range of people.

For example, Laureate Education is a US listed company offering education services to nearly 900,000 students across Latin America. It is a Public Benefit Corporation, which means that, alongside a company’s traditional role of generating profits for shareholders, public benefit is one of its charter purposes. 46% of students on average at Laureate institutions come from traditionally underserved groups such as first-generation, low-income minorities and returning adults. The company granted $750 million of scholarships and discounts to students in 2018. This is a significant amount for a company with revenue of $3.3bn that same year. Laureate is not the only example: there is a long list of publicly investable companies in Brazil, South Africa and China that play similar roles.

An important step in the investment process is to hold interviews with management, to evaluate their commitment to providing affordable, high-quality education. Companies are naturally expected to generate financial returns, but this must be driven by a focus on affordability and quality. Sometimes, even if a company ticks all the right boxes on paper, management may be focusing too much on making money and not enough on quality. This is a red flag, not just from an impact point of view but also because a successful education company cannot be built without a relentless focus on quality. Once that has been achieved, financial returns are likely to follow given the nearly endless demand for affordable quality education.

Carefully selected private education companies are among those that best fulfil the twin objectives of impact investing, i.e. financial returns and positive impact, producing good results both for society and their investors.

First published on Environmental Finance on 13 August


Koen_Eli_150x150.jpg
Eli Koen
Portfolio Manager

Expertise

Swiss & Global Equities

Why Swiss equities now? This market offers equity investors the stability and agility they need to navigate this volatile period. 

Read more
Expertise

European Equities

European equities offer unrivalled opportunities in terms of breadth of sector and market exposure.

Read more

Actualités les plus lues

UBP dans la presse 18.12.2020

The drift towards thematic investing

Rankia Pro (12.2020) - Interview with Didier Chan-Voc-Chun, UBP’s Head of Multi-Management & Fund Research

UBP dans la presse 04.01.2021

The rise of UBP’s impact strategy

Funds Society (14.12.2020) - The first strategy in UBP's impact investing platform, Positive Impact Equity, has been going from strength to strength since its inception. Impact investing specialist Yvan Delaplace details the strategy’s investment process and broader sustainability trends in the sector.

UBP dans la presse 29.01.2021

Fixed income outlook: Positive environment for credit

Institutional Money (27.01.2021) - Despite an accelerating Covid-19 spread into year-end, risk markets concluded 2020 on a strong note as investors took confidence from the commencement of the vaccine rollout in the US and UK. 


A lire également

UBP dans la presse 14.06.2021

Reprise post-Covid: l’Europe en voie de surperformer

Allnews (14.06.2021) - Après être restée en retrait par rapport aux autres régions dans le mouvement de reprise post-Covid, l’Europe devrait désormais surperformer, bénéficiant à présent de plusieurs facteurs majeurs. Ceci semble donc de bon augure pour le crédit européen et, en particulier, les segments à revenus supérieurs, tels que le «high yield» et la dette AT1

UBP dans la presse 19.05.2021

What lies ahead for bonds after this volatile start to the year?

Asset TV Masterclass (12.05.2021) - Mohammed Kazmi, Portfolio Manager & Macro-Strategist Global and Absolute Return Fixed Income at UBP, recently took part in an Asset TV broadcast, explaining why he maintains a constructive view on the fixed-income segment and outlining where he sees opportunities in the asset class.

UBP dans la presse 18.05.2021

L’agilité: facteur clé de succès de la banque privée suisse

Le Temps (17.05.2021) - La gestion de fortune suisse, parfois présentée comme traditionnelle, pour ne pas dire «old fashion», s’est encore une fois révélée être un secteur agile et innovant, lui permettant de conserver son leadership.