1. Newsroom
  2. Portfolios welcome back hedge funds
Menu
UBP in the press 30.06.2016

Portfolios welcome back hedge funds

Portfolios welcome back hedge funds

Mediocre performances, high fees, a lack of transparency: hedge funds are regularly maligned and simplistically cast in a grim light by their detractors. However, this view is a complete contradiction of the growing upswing in interest that has been seen by observers not only in the United States, where it has remained relatively high in recent years, but also, more recently, in Europe and in Asia, where only Japan is still the exception.


This interest appeared with the significant capital flows into alternative strategies. Indeed, the total amount managed in alternative strategies today is greater than the amount managed before the financial crisis, and we have seen constant growth for twelve months now.

It is the current situation of the financial markets, which are marked by increased uncertainty, that is leading asset managers to turn to alternative investments. Bond portfolios are only offering very limited – or negative – returns due to the persistence of low interest rates. Some equity markets are offering attractive earnings opportunities, but given the uncertain economic, social, demographic and geopolitical situation, volatility is inevitably higher and therefore there is increased risk in portfolios. To this can be added the question marks that are appearing over certain market truths, such as the correlation between the bond markets and equities, or that between the oil price and equities, which has been negative for a long time. Today, there is no longer the chance to counterbalance risks, but rather they add up instead.

It is therefore imperative that investors concentrate on optimising the relationship between expected returns and risks taken. In view of this, an allocation to hedge funds makes perfect sense. Historically, hedge fund managers have demonstrated their ability to generate performance with lower volatility, especially when there is less visibility on how the markets will develop.

Today, it is no longer a matter for investors to ask whether an allocation to alternative strategies is indispensible or not, but rather it is one of what is the best way to make an allocation. Besides a handful of investors in a less-regulated environment, such as family offices, or those with a very long investment horizon, such as sovereign funds, the majority of decision-makers in Europe and Asia prefer regulated, liquid and transparent investment vehicles. It is therefore a natural step for them to turn towards managers and strategies that are available in a UCITS (Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities) format.

These funds offer a number of advantages: first, their structure is defined by European regulatory authorities, meaning that, under certain conditions, they can be freely sold across the EU, in contrast to unregulated funds, commonly known as ‘offshore funds’. They also guarantee a certain level of diversification, reduce counterparty risk and prevent the excessive use of leverage. Further, they offer a level of liquidity that is much more favourable for the investor.

On top of this, the management fees are generally lower than those of their offshore counterparts and it should be noted that these fees are on a downward trend. Investors’ sophistication necessitates that fees adapt to funds’ risk-return profiles.

The answer to the question of whether a compromise has to be made on part of the performance in order to benefit of the advantages outlined above is subject to eternal debate, but, currently, the numbers do not come out in favour of this point.

Consequently, the need for diversification and reallocation of assets within portfolios are triggering strong demand for alternative strategies in Europe. Those hedge fund managers who can adapt themselves, on the one hand, to investors’ preferences, including by reducing fees, and, on the other, to regulatory constraints, will be able to attract the majority of assets. It is up to us – the professionals in selecting alternative asset managers – to identify and select the best among them.


GUNTERN.jpg

Yves Guntern
Head of Liquid Alternative Investment

 

 

Expertise

Impact investing - Contributing to a more sustainable future

What are the key features of impact investing?

Read more

Le news più lette

UBP in the press 13.02.2020

Are all batteries created equal?

Environmental finance (02.2020) - Electric vehicles (EVs) have an important contribution to make towards a zero-carbon future and therefore are suitable for inclusion in a positive impact investment strategy.

UBP in the press 17.04.2020

Smug Money podcast: Is impact investing the answer?

Good With Money (25.03.2020) – Our Co-Manager of the Positive Impact Equity strategy Rupert Welchman discusses the importance of impact investing in the current environment.

UBP in the press 03.03.2020

Discretionary management expertise moves centre-stage

Le Temps (02.03.2020) - Institutional and discretionary asset managers are increasingly using the same decision-making tools and investment techniques.

Altro da leggere

UBP in the press 06.08.2020

A pure-play private bank with a long heritage - the UBP way

WealthBriefingAsia (03.08.2020) - Ranjit Khanna, Head of South Asia and Singapore Branch Chief Executive, Union Bancaire Privée, talks to WealthBriefingAsia. The bank won Best Boutique Private Bank (Southeast Asia).

UBP in the press 03.08.2020

The dawn of the hedge fund era

Le Temps (03.08.2020) - In the past ten years, hedge funds have struggled to offer any kind of satisfactory returns, constrained by persistently weak interest rates and a lack of volatility.

UBP in the press 24.07.2020

The Covid-19 shock: has your family office proven to be resilient?

Arabian Business (12.07.2020) - As we slowly come to terms with the initial effects of the Covid-19 crisis, it is time to see what wealthy families and single-family offices in the Middle East can learn from it.