1. Newsroom
  2. Portfolios welcome back hedge funds
Menu
UBP in the press 30.06.2016

Portfolios welcome back hedge funds

Portfolios welcome back hedge funds

Mediocre performances, high fees, a lack of transparency: hedge funds are regularly maligned and simplistically cast in a grim light by their detractors. However, this view is a complete contradiction of the growing upswing in interest that has been seen by observers not only in the United States, where it has remained relatively high in recent years, but also, more recently, in Europe and in Asia, where only Japan is still the exception.


This interest appeared with the significant capital flows into alternative strategies. Indeed, the total amount managed in alternative strategies today is greater than the amount managed before the financial crisis, and we have seen constant growth for twelve months now.

It is the current situation of the financial markets, which are marked by increased uncertainty, that is leading asset managers to turn to alternative investments. Bond portfolios are only offering very limited – or negative – returns due to the persistence of low interest rates. Some equity markets are offering attractive earnings opportunities, but given the uncertain economic, social, demographic and geopolitical situation, volatility is inevitably higher and therefore there is increased risk in portfolios. To this can be added the question marks that are appearing over certain market truths, such as the correlation between the bond markets and equities, or that between the oil price and equities, which has been negative for a long time. Today, there is no longer the chance to counterbalance risks, but rather they add up instead.

It is therefore imperative that investors concentrate on optimising the relationship between expected returns and risks taken. In view of this, an allocation to hedge funds makes perfect sense. Historically, hedge fund managers have demonstrated their ability to generate performance with lower volatility, especially when there is less visibility on how the markets will develop.

Today, it is no longer a matter for investors to ask whether an allocation to alternative strategies is indispensible or not, but rather it is one of what is the best way to make an allocation. Besides a handful of investors in a less-regulated environment, such as family offices, or those with a very long investment horizon, such as sovereign funds, the majority of decision-makers in Europe and Asia prefer regulated, liquid and transparent investment vehicles. It is therefore a natural step for them to turn towards managers and strategies that are available in a UCITS (Undertakings for Collective Investments in Transferable Securities) format.

These funds offer a number of advantages: first, their structure is defined by European regulatory authorities, meaning that, under certain conditions, they can be freely sold across the EU, in contrast to unregulated funds, commonly known as ‘offshore funds’. They also guarantee a certain level of diversification, reduce counterparty risk and prevent the excessive use of leverage. Further, they offer a level of liquidity that is much more favourable for the investor.

On top of this, the management fees are generally lower than those of their offshore counterparts and it should be noted that these fees are on a downward trend. Investors’ sophistication necessitates that fees adapt to funds’ risk-return profiles.

The answer to the question of whether a compromise has to be made on part of the performance in order to benefit of the advantages outlined above is subject to eternal debate, but, currently, the numbers do not come out in favour of this point.

Consequently, the need for diversification and reallocation of assets within portfolios are triggering strong demand for alternative strategies in Europe. Those hedge fund managers who can adapt themselves, on the one hand, to investors’ preferences, including by reducing fees, and, on the other, to regulatory constraints, will be able to attract the majority of assets. It is up to us – the professionals in selecting alternative asset managers – to identify and select the best among them.


GUNTERN.jpg

Yves Guntern
Head of Liquid Alternative Investment

 

 

Asset class

Japanese equities

Why the current outlook makes a compelling case for Japanese equities

Watch the videos

Le news più lette

UBP in the press 02.04.2019

Zurich: a nerve centre for UBP

Le Temps (29.03.2019) - UBP, which acquired Coutts exactly four years ago, has doubled the amount of assets it manages in Zurich to CHF 25 billion in five years. We spoke to Adrian Künzi, who has headed UBP’s local branch for the last year.

UBP in the press 03.12.2018

It’s all in the family for Union Bancaire Privée's de Picciotto

The Straits Times (25.11.2018) - As times change, CEO’s ambition is to make UBP one of the biggest family-owned banks.

UBP in the press 26.03.2019

UBP is ready for all Brexit eventualities

AWP (25.03.2019) - Union Bancaire Privée (UBP) anticipated the uncertainties surrounding future relations between the United Kingdom and the European Union. By expanding in London with the acquisition of ACPI and maintaining a strong presence in Luxembourg, the Geneva bank is prepared for any outcome, as its CEO Guy de Picciotto explained to AWP.


Altro da leggere

UBP in the press 23.05.2019

Oro, ecco perché fa fatica a brillare

Finanz und Wirtschaft (18.05.2019) - La quotazione dell'oro oggi si sta indebolendo a 1.275 dollari l'oncia. Come è accaduto nel 2018 il metallo giallo subisce la concorrenza del dollaro quando gli investitori vanno alla ricerca di un porto sicuro.

UBP in the press 20.05.2019

Distinction between private and institutional clients fades

Le Temps (20.05.2019) - Wealth management professionals have all noticed that every year the line between private and institutional clients is fading and their specific needs, which used to be so different, are becoming increasingly similar. And the trend is not a passing one.

UBP in the press 09.05.2019

China is the place to invest in equities

Bilan (24.04.2019) - Since China joined the WTO in 2001 and adopted a capitalist approach to its economy, investors have viewed the local financial markets with an equal mix of hope and fear.