1. Newsroom
  2. Factoring in ESG criteria in Japan
Menu
UBP in the press 09.04.2019

Factoring in ESG criteria in Japan

Factoring in ESG criteria in Japan

Bilan (03.2019) - There are many aspects of Japanese culture that emphasise harmony in terms of people’s relationships with nature and society.


Some people, however, depending on how they regard Japan, may see this notion of harmony as a way of exerting control. But is that enough to make Japan a laggard in terms of environment, social and governance (ESG) considerations? Is control more important for companies than longevity, which they regard as secondary to the need to achieve growth at any price? We think not: we take a more positive view because ESG-related notions are nothing new in Japan. Indeed, they are popular, and so companies are increasingly factoring them into their business approach.

What has changed fundamentally since 2012 – when the Abe government came to power, strongly promoting the Abenomics agenda – is that institutional investors and particularly Japan’s largest pension fund GPIF (Government Pension Investment Fund) have taken an interest in companies that factor in and develop ESG criteria in the conduct of their business. If those companies were starting from scratch as some seem to believe, they would not have progressed far enough for us to be writing about responsible investment in Japan in 2019.

The best example, and by far the most commonly cited one, is that of Hiro Mizuno, GPIF’s CIO, who has become one of the main proponents of responsible investment. He strongly supported the launch of the JPX 400 index, which consists of Japan’s top 400 companies in terms of governance and respect for minority investors. For the person in charge of investments for the world’s largest pension savings portfolio, that was natural. But Hiro Mizuno did not stop there. He and his teams worked to guide their investments using new indexes, such as FTSE Blossom Japan (consisting of companies showing solid commitment to ESG practices), MSCI Japan ESG Leaders and, no less importantly, MSCI Japan Empowering Women. In late 2017, Hiro Mizuno sent an even more radical message by announcing, during the PRI (Principles for Responsible Investment) conference, that GPIF would factor ESG criteria into all its investments going forward.

It goes without saying that GPIF’s stance is having a huge impact on the way companies operate, the way their boards of directors work (since they must now include independent directors), their recruitment and wage policies and their remuneration of senior executives. The impact is being felt especially keenly among the community of investors, institutional or otherwise. Aside from any trend-setting effect or influence that GPIF may be having, the result for investors is an improvement in corporate governance as companies factor in ESG criteria. The most obvious demonstration of these changes is that companies are making better use of surplus liquidity on their balance sheets through constantly rising share buybacks and dividend payments. From the social point of view, women are playing a greater role in the workforce and more of them are reaching high-level managerial positions, gradually contributing to the shift encouraged by GPIF in the wake of Abenomics. Companies with poor environmental records are being punished by excluding them from the aforementioned indexes, but also by the fact that company valuations are increasingly reflecting the attention paid to companies’ carbon footprints by an investor community that has become more critical, and above all more selective.

As regards factoring in ESG criteria becoming the new normal for Japanese companies, then, the recent developments discussed above suggest that Japan needs a structural shift in order to change direction.

Japanese equities

Cedric_Le_Berre_150.jpg
Cédric Le Berre
Senior Analyst

Expertise

Impact investing - Contributing to a more sustainable future

What are the key features of impact investing?

Read more

Le news più lette

UBP in the press 17.04.2020

Smug Money podcast: Is impact investing the answer?

Good With Money (25.03.2020) – Our Co-Manager of the Positive Impact Equity strategy Rupert Welchman discusses the importance of impact investing in the current environment.

UBP in the press 24.04.2020

Is your low-carbon portfolio destroying the planet?

Responsible Investor (22.04.2020) - An investor who focuses solely on low carbon emissions could end up investing in polluters, while excluding some of the most important providers of solutions to the climate emergency.

UBP in the press 28.04.2020

How to hedge when volatility itself becomes volatile

Professional Pensions (24.04.2020) - The fastest bear market in history ends one of the longest-ever bull markets

Altro da leggere

UBP in the press 24.09.2020

Positive event risks for gold

Finanz und Wirtschaft (19.09.2020) - Since early August, gold prices have traded in a tight range, between 1900 and 2000 per ounce.

UBP in the press 15.09.2020

Private Debt – the Last Refuge for Yield

Agefi Indices (11.09.2020) - The Covid-19 pandemic has led to an economic downturn worse than the global financial crisis. The response from governments and central banks has been dramatic in both fiscal and monetary terms.

UBP in the press 07.09.2020

AT1s look attractive for investors today

Institutional Money (04.09.2020) - AT1s having benefited from the last decade’s banking reforms, the potential for attractive returns in this asset class could grow considerably in a stabilisation scenario.